Today I did two workshops for Sullivan County in the North East corner of Tennessee. It was a great day with several hundred teachers in attendance. My workshops included a session on Skype and one on the DE Streaming Builders.
When I walked into the room provided, I was a little confused. There was a screen rolled up on the wall, but there was no projector, no electrical cords, no Internet cable, no….well, there wasn’t much. Since I was confused, I decided to see if every room was like this.
I walked out of the language arts room assigned to me and into the one next door. In that room was a bright, shining SMART board hanging on the wall and a projector mounted in the ceiling. I looked back into my room. Now I was really confused.
Two language arts rooms side by side, and they couldn’t be any different. I wondered what that said about the instruction going on in each of those rooms. Okay, I wondered a little about what it said about the two teachers, but I quickly decided that both of them were dedicated, well-trained teachers in their craft. But one of them had access to a lot more than the other. I wondered, does that make one room better than the other? Is one instruction more beneficial than the other? Is one style more effective?
If, as a principal or other school leader, our answer to any of those questions is “yes,” then we are not only short changing a teacher, but every student that comes through that classroom. If the answer is “no,” then why spend the thousands of dollars to make one room more technologically advanced than the other?
In our district we just bought interactive white boards for nearly every classroom in every school. Everyone seems to be excited about that, including me. But the question remains: what will this mean to instruction? Will it be better? Or just fancier? More effective? Or just more bells and whistles? Only time will tell.
I wish I could have been in those two classrooms on a day when kids were there. The tale of two classrooms would be an interesting read.














